A better way of thinking about Wall Street's year-end price targets πΊοΈ
'As a compass as opposed to a GPS' π§π
Iβm not all that crazy about one-year price targets for the S&P 500. Predicting exactly where prices will be in 12 months is impossibly hard, and no one has figured out how to do it consistently.
But as the related links below show, I still spend a healthy amount of time covering them.
Thatβs because we can learn a lot of lessons from this exercise. Also, the research behind these targets is often very interesting and useful for long-term investors. And price targets can help us understand a strategistβs view of the direction of the market.
Leave it to RBCβs Lori Calvasina, one of the sharpest strategists on Wall Street, to provide a great analogy that sheβs been sharing for a while. From her research note on Monday (emphasis added):
As always, we stress that our price target is a signaling mechanism for our views on stock market direction from here through the end of the year in question (2025) that should be viewed as a compass as opposed to a GPS. It is a construct that helps to articulate whether we believe stocks will move higher and why. We do expect to revise our price target throughout the year as new information about the backdrop for stocks becomes available β the exact same way analysts who cover individual companies make adjustments to their price targets as new information emerges.
It takes a pretty thoughtful analyst to acknowledge that itβs not possible to have all of the next yearβs market-moving information at any given time. And therefore, itβs not possible to derive a one-year price target with a very high degree of confidence.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to π TKer by Sam Ro to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.