The problem with historical P/E data π
Today's S&P 500 isn't like the S&P 500 of the past βοΈ
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe18083e3-85df-4001-993d-29940e61b454_1938x1400.png)
The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is probably the most popular and straightforward way to measure value in the stock market.
However, investors should be careful about the signal they glean from P/E ratios, especially relative to historical averages.
βThe S&P 500 is statistically expensive on 19 of the 20 metrics we track and is trading at its 95th percentile based on the first metric, trailing P/E, based on data since 1900,β BofAβs Savita Subramanian observed in a research note in which she makes the case for βWhy a 95th percentile P/E shouldnβt keep you up at night.β
βWe question the validity of comparing today's S&P 500 valuation to history given changes in the index's makeup (asset light), & healthier attributes of old economy sectors & renewed focus on efficiency,β she wrote on Wednesday.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to TKer by Sam Ro to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.